The costs of being involved and payment

People who got involved in research told us about the costs to them. These aren’t just financial costs, but include costs in terms of time, energy and emotion. After her son’s death, Kath chose to review grant proposals at first because going to meetings was too emotional. Jennifer said she had broken down once or twice in meetings; Derek once had to leave the room and take a few deep breaths after hearing a distressing description of an operation. Helena said for her it was more to do with the stress of getting your points across: ‘there is a potential emotional toll but I think it’s more to do with whether you’re listened to really.’ Tiredness can be a particular problem for people with some conditions, but everyone can find it tiring reading documents and travelling to meetings. It can also be frustrating and stressful; Hazel knew people who had dropped out because of this.

It can be hard talking about cancer, but it’s a way to help others now Stephen can’t train as a doctor.

Age at interview 18

Gender Male

View profile

Having a long-term condition is tiring, so Catherine has to budget’ her time. She finds it easier to be involved through email.

Age at interview 51

Gender Female

View profile

The main cost for Sharon is time. Seeing the research done gives her hope.

Age at interview 44

Gender Female

View profile

Hazel has seen good people leave if they feel they’re not properly involved.

Age at interview 67

Gender Female

View profile

There was general agreement that no-one should be ‘out of pocket’, as Margaret put it. INVOLVE (the national NHS advisory group for patient and public involvement) recommends covering expenses as a minimum. Commonly this includes travel expenses, with meals and overnight accommodation if necessary – though not everyone chooses to claim these. Some organisations book rail fares and hotels upfront for people so they don’t have to pay. But expenses might also include printer ink and paper (assuming people have a computer); telephone call costs; the costs of arranging care for children or other family dependents; or needing to bring a carer with you to a meeting. It can take a long time for people to have their expenses reimbursed, which was frustrating for some people because, like Marney said, even small amounts add up.

Jennifer doesn’t mind spending the time on getting involved, but she would like her expenses reimbursed promptly, just to show her work is appreciated.

Age at interview 58

Gender Female

View profile

There is quite a time commitment involved. Travel is always covered but some people may need childcare costs and other expenses such as printing and phone bills.

Age at interview 54

Gender Male

View profile

Apart from expenses, the question of whether and how much patients and members of the public should be paid for their involvement causes much debate. Some felt uncomfortable with the whole idea of being paid. This might be because they saw it as a purely voluntary activity, which they did for altruistic reasons. Tom and Dave X worried about whether it was good use of public or charity funds. Some also felt they were repaying a debt to the NHS and previous research participants, and that being paid for it could in some ways undermine the value of the contribution they wanted to make.

Margaret feels shes giving something back for previous research participants who made her care possible, and improving treatment for future patients.

Age at interview 63

Gender Female

View profile

It was also argued that not being paid gave people greater freedom to say no to particular tasks or projects and to be independent and critical; Charles said, ‘I think they should have their expenses reimbursed but I think really you’re looking for a completely unbiased input, and I think that that is best done on a free entirely voluntary input.’ A few people worried that payment might attract people to get involved for the wrong reasons. But others argued that researchers were ‘getting a group of consultants for nothing’, as Nadeem put it, so payment was welcome recognition of the value of their work, even if it would never be their main reason for getting involved. Nadeem continued saying, ‘I want to still make money to pay the bills, so every little helps’. Janice said, ‘My husband says it works out at less than the minimum wage per hour, but again it’s more about it being a nod in the direction and that’s not been a problem.’

Dave G would not want to feel like a paid employee. Enjoying the work is all the reward he wants.

Age at interview 67

Gender Male

View profile

Margaret doesn’t feel how she is valued depends on whether she is paid. She puts in a lot of hours but she can always say no.

Age at interview 63

Gender Female

View profile

It’s nice to get a bit of payment but it would never be Nadeem’s main reason for getting involved.

Age at interview 57

Gender Male

View profile

INVOLVE supports the principle that people should be offered payment for their time, even if they do not wish to claim it, and some of the people we spoke to said they were doing it because they could be paid for it. Because there’s a history of heart disease in his family, Francesco gave up work to do something he was interested in. He said he needed to be paid for involvement and Mary said it was ‘disgraceful’ to think that people may not be paid for being involved. Helena was concerned it was exploitative not to at least offer to pay people, and that not doing so would limit who could get involved.

Being paid is important to Francesco. He sees his skills as something valuable to researchers.

Age at interview 57

Gender Male

View profile

Helena feels lots of excuses are used not to pay people for involvement, but it is exploitative not to offer payment and limits who can get involved.

Age at interview 43

Gender Female

View profile

There were many reasons why people thought it was right to be paid for involvement, including creating a more equal relationship with professionals around the table; valuing and respecting people’s contribution; replacing lost income if people had to take time off; and attracting a more diverse group of people, not just retired and/or middle class people who can afford to give time for free. As Mary said, ‘why should I volunteer my time when everybody else around the table isn’t volunteering their time?’ Kath argued that researchers should always build proper costs for involvement into their funding applications and they can find out more about this by referring to the guidance provided by INVOLVE. Because she is self-employed Catherine said that she’d be able to attend more training if her time was paid for, so the issue of payment is something that needs to be thought about.

For Carolyn, paying people for involvement shows it’s valued. It’s important to fund it properly to get a more diverse group of people involved.

Age at interview 69

Gender Female

View profile

Paying people for their involvement gives them equal value and status. People can donate what they’re paid to charity if they wish.

Age at interview 65

Gender Male

View profile

Costs for involvement should always be built in. Working people may not be able to take part otherwise.

Age at interview 55

View profile

What people got paid for varied – in some cases it was only for taking part in meetings, whereas others got paid for time spent reading. Different organisations take different approaches. For example, Janice knew she would not get paid for being on a research ethics committee, but she does get paid for reviewing grant applications.

People who are on benefits may not be able to accept payments for their involvement work or certain types of expenses. Offering to pay people can be counted as an offer of work, even if the person says no to the payment. There were strong feelings that this was unfair and something the government needed to address. Up-to-date guidance on this is available from NHS INVOLVE.

Not offering payment excludes some groups of people. But the government needs to address the problem of it affecting their benefits.

Age at interview 60

Gender Male

View profile

Mary feels paying people for involvement should always be included in grants. She does not see why she should not be paid just because people on benefits cannot be paid.

Age at interview 60

Gender Female

View profile

Alan has changed his mind. He used to think payment would attract people for the wrong reasons’ but now thinks it’s essential for some.

Age at interview 67

Gender Male

View profile

Although many people were in favour of being paid for their time, there were concerns even among those who accepted such payments that it risked making people too professional and motivated by the money, undermining what Peter called ‘the volunteer ethic’. He said, ‘I think, if somebody is motivated enough to want to do it for nothing, then that’s quite powerful. I think as soon as they get paid for it, personally, and it is a personal view, I think things change.’ Richard agreed with this, even though he knows some people might see him as already quite professional. Derek explained that he treats each invitation differently; sometimes he is paid and sometimes not.

Richard feels it’s right to be paid for involvement but it’s not enough to make a living. He doesn’t think people should do it for the money

Age at interview 54

Gender Male

View profile

Derek puts many hours into involvement, often unpaid. But if people want him to take part in a demanding committee as an equal he expects to get an honorarium* or to be paid for it as work.

Age at interview 62

Gender Male

View profile

As well as money, people have also had their contribution recognised through ‘in-kind’ benefits, and Kath said it was important for researchers to think about what they’re offering when they invite people to get involved. These could include getting a bursary to attend a conference or training, being able to get academic journal articles or use university libraries. Neil felt the allowance for buying meals needed to be reviewed. He said, ‘People have got to eat, you know. So it’s worth keeping in mind that if you’re going respect PPI volunteers who are not in it for the money, at least allow them to eat well.’ (See also ‘Reasons for getting involved – personal benefits).
* An honorarium is a one-off payment made for voluntary services, which you can be taxed on.

See also:
Representing a range of views and experiences: diversity
Representing a range of views and experiences: being representative
Difficulties and barriers to involvement
Factors which make involvement easier

Last reviewed July 2017.
Last updated March 2016.