Getting information about the 100,000 Genomes Project

In February 2017, in response to participants’ and healthcare professional’s feedback (through a national evaluation) Genomics England carried out a major update of the written information available to participants and was awarded a Crystal Mark from the Plain English Campaign. You can see current advice and information about participating in the project by clicking on the link in our Resources page.
Depending on when they were asked to take part in the Project, the people we spoke to may have received earlier versions of the leaflets, information sheets and consent forms, and so the comments you see below may relate to versions that have since have been improved.
People often had very little knowledge about the 100,000 Genomes project when they were first invited to participate. Some felt it would have be useful to have more publicity for the project so that people are aware of it when it is first mentioned to them by health practitioners.

Sheila and Edward think people the project needs to have a bit more presence and public awareness. People trust things they have heard about.

People wanted to know different things including:
  • What taking part would involve for them personally
  • How their data would be used and stored now and in the future
  • How soon they would get the results, and
  • What, if anything, the results would mean for them
People gained information by looking at the information pack (which includes a Participant Information Sheet, relevant consent form and optional materials such as an ‘introduction to the Project’ leaflet), asking questions and accessing information online.
People were either given an information pack by a health professional for them to take away and read or it was sent to them at home. People usually had the opportunity to discuss the information they were given or ask questions and some had the leaflet explained to them in detail. But not everyone felt they needed a lot of information about the project.

Two medical professionals spoke to Pauline about the project and explained it to her. She didn’t understand some of what was said but was happy to help others.

Age at interview 84

Gender Female

Age at diagnosis 83

View profile

Asking questions to health professionals

Some asked questions when they were invited to participate.

Vanessa was invited to take part by a nurse when she was waiting for an appointment. She only wanted to know if participating would involve taking any trial drugs. The nurse explained that it wouldn’st.

Age at interview 60

Gender Female

Age at diagnosis 54

View profile

Pam wanted to know if participating would involve needles. The health professional who invited her to take part told her that blood would be taken during her operation and Pam agreed straight away.

Age at interview 84

Age at diagnosis 84

View profile

Emma and her husband want to know that companies couldn’t trace their results back to them and that they didn’t have to disclose results to insurance companies. They felt reassured by the staff who were very knowledgeable about the study.

Age at interview 40

Gender Female

View profile

Leaflets and other paperwork

People received written information about the 100,000 Genomes project when they were invited to participate and some read it in detail and discussed it with family members before deciding whether to take part in the project. The written information covers a range of questions people might have including what the aims of the project are, what a genome is, what is involved in taking part, what results people might get and who looks at the data. There are versions of the written information leaflet suitable for children (6-10 year olds) and young people (11-15 year olds) as well as different formats for those who are visually impaired (large print) and those with learning difficulties (easy-read).
Genetics is a complex subject and, for those with no background knowledge of medical research or genetics and who were hearing about the project for the first time, it could be a lot to take in. Even those who understood genetics could find the written information they were given very detailed. Lucy Y found it ‘mind boggling’ and felt there was a ‘huge amount to take on board’ so she read it a few times. Others who were invited to participate around the time they had been diagnosed with cancer also found it a difficult time to take all the information in. Most people got more information from having the leaflet explained to them than from reading it themselves.

Kath thinks the leaflet could be in plainer English and said it is better if you have someone to explain it to you. She thinks it puts people off signing up for the project.

Age at interview 65

Gender Female

Age at diagnosis 64

View profile

Jenny thinks the information leaflet and consent form would be better if it was written in layman’s terms. But the health professional who went through it with her did a good job of explaining it.

Age at interview 23

Gender Female

View profile

Heather and Julie describe a booklet that was given to them which was bulky and technical. It focused more on how the research would affect them rather than how it would be carried out.

Raymond said there was a lot to read and it took him half a day.

Age at interview 58

Gender Male

Age at diagnosis 57

View profile

However, several people, including Birgit and Betty, thought the information leaflets given about the project were very clear. Linda said it was ‘pretty straightforward’.

Betty enjoyed reading the leaflet and explains why she found it useful.

Age at interview 85

Gender Female

Age at diagnosis 84

View profile

Ultimately, most people we spoke to understood enough about the project to think it was worthwhile. Some people didn’t feel the need to read the leaflet in detail and had trust in the process.

Bart found the part about data protection quite technical but wasn’t surprised and thought it was appropriate given the subject matter.

Age at interview 61

Gender Male

Age at diagnosis 60

View profile

Richard thought the written information was self-explanatory and didn’t feel he needed to read through it. It was explained to him and he felt the project was worthwhile..

Age at interview 73

Gender Male

Age at diagnosis 73

View profile

Arthur was told all about the project at his pre-op assessment and thought let’s do it. He took an information pack home with him but didn’st take too much of it in.

Age at interview 82

Gender Male

Age at diagnosis 82

View profile

A few people wanted more information and some looked online for information after reading the leaflet.

After reading the information Linda started to try and find out more about the project.

Age at interview 58

Gender Female

Age at diagnosis 57

View profile

After receiving written information about the project Rebecca also looked the project up online, which she found worthwhile.

Age at interview 49

Gender Female

Age at diagnosis 48

View profile

Emma wanted to find out more than was in the leaflet. She wanted more detail on what was involved in taking part and to hear from others who had participated.

Age at interview 40

Gender Female

View profile

Information online about the 100,000 Genomes Project

Several people used the internet at different times in the process to access more information. Nick used Google to make sure the project was ‘genuine’.

Kay used Twitter to contact Genomics England to get more information about the project. They sent her a link which she found really helpful. The Twitter response made a huge difference to her deciding to participate.

Age at interview 35

Gender Female

View profile

Aileen suggests the link to the Genomics England project website could be more prominent in the initial information pack.

Age at interview 57

Gender Female

Age at diagnosis 56

View profile

People had different views about the Genomics England website and how useful they found it and a few people, like Grandma Football and Linda, were not aware there was a website. Birgit found the website ‘quite clear’ and said there were ‘different strands’ for researchers and people who were part of the project. Kay found the website ‘quite good’ and ‘interesting’. But others wanted other things from the website.

Birgit was happy with the information given during the process and found the website helpful. She liked the fact it wasn’t too simple.

Age at interview 41

Gender Female

Age at diagnosis 41

View profile

Emma feels that the website could be more interactive.

Age at interview 40

Gender Female

View profile